Contact the Editorial Desk

Editorial correspondence

This desk welcomes notes about the record itself: a source quoted loosely, a study whose results have been superseded, a regulatory status that has changed, or a peer-reviewed paper on BPC-157, TB-500 or the combination that belongs on the references page.

Corrections about time are especially welcome, since they are the hardest thing to get right in this field. A study that reports an onset interval, a persistence window, or a follow-up longer than the ones already listed here would change what several pages say, and would be added with the species and design stated alongside it.

The notes easiest to act on name three things: which page, the exact passage in question, and the supporting source — a DOI or PubMed identifier wherever one exists.

Editorial mailbox: editors@restorativepeptides.com

Outside this desk's scope

So that no message goes unanswered for the wrong reason, some requests fall outside what a literature digest can do. This desk cannot:

• Advise on, endorse or comment on human use of any compound described here.
• Name a dose, schedule or route for any individual, or interpret a cited study's dosing for a particular situation.
• Judge whether a finding from an animal model applies to a specific injury or person.
• Sell, source, recommend or help locate a compound from any supplier.
• Advise athletes subject to anti-doping rules, beyond noting that every compound covered here is prohibited in tested sport.

Questions of that kind belong with a licensed clinician who knows the individual case.